Dakota Durango Forum banner
21 - 40 of 47 Posts
15's isn't slow? For the price point and for what it's supposed to be, it's slow.

I have no doubt it can run 14's. Some sites list the new civic si's at 15.4 while another review listed it at 14.7, and many more than a few people have run faster than that even.

Cool thing is he smoked it. Regardless of what it is. i find it more fun to fuck with slow cars that people drive like they stole it vs a faster car.

Hell just the other day a scion xb was driving that thing like an idiot. Tried to go around me so i decided I wouldn't let him. Did it like 3 times and he gave up.
 
Nice kill. My buddy has a 04 RX8 6-speed and it's not that fast. It's not bad, but not as fast as it looks and get shitty mpg. Nothing like beating a car that worth like 3-4 times what yours is worth.
 
i know this is an old thread....

but an rx-8 is by far slow!!

especially considering the little rotary engine is equivealent to the size of geo metro 3cyl (literally)

that rotary engine is about 1.3L ....putting out 240hp stock...thats just amazing.

my friend has one with an intake and cat-back and it HAULS ASS...0-60 in a little under 5sec and pulls HARD all the way to 9000 rpms.

for you to keep up with that....you have a fast ass truck my friend

:mullet:
 
i know this is an old thread....

but an rx-8 is by far slow!!

especially considering the little rotary engine is equivealent to the size of geo metro 3cyl (literally)

that rotary engine is about 1.3L ....putting out 240hp stock...thats just amazing.

my friend has one with an intake and cat-back and it HAULS ASS...0-60 in a little under 5sec and pulls HARD all the way to 9000 rpms.

for you to keep up with that....you have a fast ass truck my friend

:mullet:
It could've been the automatic, which is a 16 second car, but i doubt it though if he was only a car ahead by 85.

Intake and cat-back gets a car that goes from 0-60 in 7 seconds ( MAYBE 6.5 with power shifting it) down to a 5 second 0-60?

What are you smoking?

Please, the rx8 isn't even impressive boosted. They will DESTROY you on a curvy road though, you won't even see his taillights anymore after 2 or 3 turns.


I see you drive a 6 cyl dak. that's probably why you think it hauls ass :p If you drove the r/t you wouldn't be saying his car is that fast. Mazda overrated the engine horribly. Most people dyno them stock with all the ecu updates around 165-180 whp.

the s2000 is much more impressive. 240 hp 2.2L dynos 210-220 at the wheels. rwd, so it's probably a bit underrated (10-15 hp maybe)
 
It could've been the automatic, which is a 16 second car, but i doubt it though if he was only a car ahead by 85.

Intake and cat-back gets a car that goes from 0-60 in 7 seconds ( MAYBE 6.5 with power shifting it) down to a 5 second 0-60?

What are you smoking?

Please, the rx8 isn't even impressive boosted. They will DESTROY you on a curvy road though, you won't even see his taillights anymore after 2 or 3 turns.


I see you drive a 6 cyl dak. that's probably why you think it hauls ass :p If you drove the r/t you wouldn't be saying his car is that fast. Mazda overrated the engine horribly. Most people dyno them stock with all the ecu updates around 165-180 whp.

the s2000 is much more impressive. 240 hp 2.2L dynos 210-220 at the wheels. rwd, so it's probably a bit underrated (10-15 hp maybe)

well a cat-back and intake opend it up ALOT...i could tell the diff. from just the intake alone...the same mods dont have the same effect on every motor. ive seen intakes open up 20+ hp one one car and maybe 5 on another

i dont smoke
and yes the handling is insane

...i see you drive a honda...is that y you think the s2000 is so great. i mean, theyre nice n all...but :huh: ive driven an r/t (and plenty of other v8's)...have you ever driven an rx-8?

i never said the rx-8 is the fastest car im just sayin its fast. and for a ( i think stock) 5.9 245hp to pull that heavy ass truck faster than that light ass240hp rx-8 ... i was just surprised... he has a fast ass truck
 
KREWZER can we get some spec on your setup?
 
damn i thought the rx8 had alot more to them guess not. NICE KILL!!!
 
those RX-8s are kinda fun to drive, nice wiiiide powerband, makes decent power from 3k to 9k rpm. But they are pig heavy for as little power as they have.


Wanna know the cheapest way to make an RX-8 or RX-7 fast? throw an SBC 350 in it ^^
 
well a cat-back and intake opend it up ALOT...i could tell the diff. from just the intake alone...the same mods dont have the same effect on every motor. ive seen intakes open up 20+ hp one one car and maybe 5 on another

i dont smoke
and yes the handling is insane

...i see you drive a honda...is that y you think the s2000 is so great. i mean, theyre nice n all...but :huh: ive driven an r/t (and plenty of other v8's)...have you ever driven an rx-8?

i never said the rx-8 is the fastest car im just sayin its fast. and for a ( i think stock) 5.9 245hp to pull that heavy ass truck faster than that light ass240hp rx-8 ... i was just surprised... he has a fast ass truck
For the last fucking time. Overrated engine. It is NOT 240 fucking horsepower. Look up stock rx8 dynos and prepare to be unimpressed for a motor rated at 237. Actually i'll do it for you.

http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=77031

Quote from page 4, "The best full original RX8 we had in the last 3 years (among about hundred rx8 hi-pow) had about 207hp SAE=223PS STD at the crank."

the best out of 100 rx8's rated for 231 hp was 207 at the crank on that dyno.

Wow?

I talked about the s2000 because it was in the same class AND price range of this car, and it's easily 1-1.5 seconds faster in the 1/4 mile with a good driver. That's a big fucking difference.

I love the rx8, but it's underpowered, and nothing is going to change that except money.
 
For the last fucking time. Overrated engine. It is NOT 240 fucking horsepower. Look up stock rx8 dynos and prepare to be unimpressed for a motor rated at 237. Actually i'll do it for you.

http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=77031

Quote from page 4, "The best full original RX8 we had in the last 3 years (among about hundred rx8 hi-pow) had about 207hp SAE=223PS STD at the crank."

the best out of 100 rx8's rated for 231 hp was 207 at the crank on that dyno.

Wow?

I talked about the s2000 because it was in the same class AND price range of this car, and it's easily 1-1.5 seconds faster in the 1/4 mile with a good driver. That's a big fucking difference.

I love the rx8, but it's underpowered, and nothing is going to change that except money.
go away no one cares.....
 
^^ i can only hope you die :(
take your ricer bullshit somewhere else douchebag, you expect to talk shit to a bunch of people whom are dodge enthusiasts and your preaching about shit no one cares about, and you roll around in a pos civic. go away:bye:
 
those RX-8s are kinda fun to drive, nice wiiiide powerband, makes decent power from 3k to 9k rpm. But they are pig heavy for as little power as they have.


Wanna know the cheapest way to make an RX-8 or RX-7 fast? throw an SBC 350 in it ^^
Or a single turbo LS1

Image


Image


Dont like Chevys here is a SBF
Image
 
21 - 40 of 47 Posts